LISTSERV@TAUNIVM keeps complaining that LISTSERV@BITNIC and LISTSERV@PUCC are sending it DISTRIBUTE jobs with no recipient for TAUNIVM. Groan. I have consequently sent the latest version of LINKSWT FILE and PEERS NAMES to LISTSERV@PUCC in the hope to fix the problem (they were a little outdated), but for BITNIC I just don't understand. TAUNIVM and BITNIC have the very same identical versions of LINKSWT FILE, PEERS NAMES *and* BITEARN NODES. Since they use the same release of LISTSERV, I can't understand how they may have different opinions as to where the recipients are supposed to go!! I'm just puzzled. Can anyone try to trap one of those DISTRIBUTE jobs and forward a copy to me so I can try to analyze the problem? The only possibility I have found is that some of the recipients are from another network, and that the two servers have a different version of DOMAIN NAMES and therefore a different idea of where in BITNET the gateway is. Or one of the two servers was not rebooted since the last update of BITEARN NODES and consequently did not do its NODESGEN, but this strikes me as very improbable at best. Eric