Peter, You're obviously right but what does this have to do with PEERS NAMES and the impossibility to store it on release 1.5h servers? At present PEERS NAMES is only 350 records or so in Netdata format and we're not yet forced to use an update concept -- please remember that UPDNODES is very slow and requires a lot of OS storage. We also don't have a checksum system yet. Anyway I don't think this is our most important problem right now. Eric