Peter,
 
  You're obviously right  but what does this  have to do with  PEERS NAMES and
the impossibility to store it on  release 1.5h servers? At present PEERS NAMES
is only 350 records or so in Netdata format and we're not yet forced to use an
update concept  -- please remember that  UPDNODES is very slow  and requires a
lot of OS  storage. We also don't  have a checksum system yet.  Anyway I don't
think this is our most important problem right now.
 
  Eric