Is it just me, or has everybody been getting mail from LIAISON with an incorrect Reply-To: line? The line I get reads Reply-To: LIAISON BITNIC BITNIC LIAISON List which is reply hard to reply to. Perhaps an "@" got lost somewhere? If it helps to know, my copy came BITNIC-> MARIST -> TCSVM -> me. The Reply-To= fields in the headers look reasonable: BITNIC: Reply-to= List,Respect MARIST: Reply-to= "Network Site Liaisons <LIAISON@BITNIC>",Respect TCSVM: Reply-to= "Network Site Liaisons <LIAISON@BITNIC>",Respect The phrase "BITNIC LIAISON List" appears only in the header of the list at BITNIC. They are running Eric's emergency 1.5k and are the only one using Reply-to=List, so perhaps there's a bug there and BITNIC needs to change their header to look like the others until it's fixed.