Hmm... Let me straighten this out: I never intended to generate one reply per node to the global signoff command, except of course if the issuer is signed up to a list on each node. This is a bug which has to be fixed. I will remove all the :lists. stuff from the next version of PEERS NAMES, which I will send out shortly. Please do not send me updates with just a ':lists.' tag in it, the LISTS database automatically maintains this info in a much more accurate way. The problem with server #111 (DBNGMD12) comes from the fact that I don't distribute PEERS NAMES every time I make a change to my copy. However, when a new LISTSERV gets installed somewhere, I send a copy of my version of PEERS NAMES to it because the one in the shipment file (as of the day I sent the shipment) is usually outdated (people never install the code immediately). I may also have to update the CEARN server so that new postmasters can GET the LCOORD files. Eric