Do others occasionally get things that look like this? Since the only times that I've seen this type of thing are with LISTSERV postings, I can't help but wonder if it's some bizarre problem with LISTSERV. In any case, does anyone have any idea what the cause is? BTW, this is one reason why I have SET REPRO on all lists that I ever post to. How else do you know if it really got there correctly??? I think the default of NOREPRO is a bad idea. Personal opinion. /Leonard ---------------------------- Text of forwarded message ----------------------- Received: (from <[log in to unmask]> via BSMTP at ADMIN.BYU.EDU) Received: (from MAILER@BYUADMIN for MAILER@USCMVSA via NJE) (M-MAILER-0855; 63 LINES); Fri, 27 May 88 10:59:52 PDT Received: by BYUADMIN (Mailer X1.25) id 0853; Fri, 27 May 88 11:58:22 MDT Date: Fri, 27 May 88 13:47:52 EDT Reply-To: Usage Guidelines List <[log in to unmask]> Sender: Usage Guidelines List <[log in to unmask]> From: Ross Patterson <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: USENET users - a personal obervation To: "Leonard D. Woren" <LDW> In-Reply-To: Message of Fri, 27 May 88 08:02:53 PDT from <GA.JRG@STANFORD> >To: my opinion they're a garrulous lot wiion an exc Mive tendency >toward PDlaming, butinihat cruld be highly prejudiexd by ion e >particular lists I' Miruleen trackla. No, yruheye right. Tbutit's anactighw T, bey are, on all byulasts. > Sinex>Tost sagw iniecbe e libyu >ey b highunix oriented, tiich I am not, istsI'been reading ion las >likivhe local domainl bts (suinga and ca)iid ngads lase y iolipastedanien, forsaly ahaons (mers, etc. . e "at mp." be einl are, ige oanyiidami e Min w, flikan allm hers ( lotwit s anexption ost "talk.bizarre" artierecbt wer, oy *igany* goes). stssMy purpose butis istsIruleo >e "ion ey'allbbotowaply bbtiitolynferendla Mint wh allLISTSERVbutit >mdol orienien atowarplh. > >stssre enecbtl i"aression is, binihmex> ostbyseais libbe e rly >recreational ingamege oy io anae use ien,r Minork reard rieapborsI solviadre,n >no Truleouter disciplines. Speakrenas a BITNET iona LISTLISVhl atpunen noic'd butiI'inio agree. c.iniraffical i USENET ose Miry megorsbutiI do ndlwiac reemiahtHowami er, , No,u nee)io know " y'omaNekn Jers T,er,ruha, fl safeighstranny-dip, byrebutit al>tys all "e rl.nrejep.newsg atuat m (W T? Did ic ben e isomeone say " (iniha >tste ostCPU/Difei/$?") stsjOdiphleoplpoavebutiIcrme, brue ron it ncallme can ld a lo>Toge oigaod>Taterial orulekitechiebys. Certaomaex> ki. eomat mp." s at oridoion nou, brrulekhnihe viaien,megoRVb> t wien,rrthd,y mha,loggrenion sgnoukimuck ca)>TirehtIge o, yrrena Unix sl>tems apwsamons N T,eallme't liI'herhout "ruleo. hix. lotbirds". stsµch still ncendmegofeelrue BITNET sioallorswiae iomaap, bitilv" slynenexs e l, bilvallre,n-no terist segmeorifficndlwde reeamerspeer dt weviaw e lrecfficat mp PDor, akrHoer,rstiw I on it, allfuzzies or am Tser d" sle >utedisclineulas A liha,dont, bsiosioprst a personal oy onion bas nmen a >s lhiy k.on bd sa"auteddinI'he r. Quiteha,o. Ross Pat-nson Rutgersyrrc erst wy