> >I would like someone to actually convince me that this list is worth spending >25% of our bandwidth, not to mention the LISTSERV/MAILER CPU time, etc etc. No >other list in the world produces anything above 20% of the INFO-VAX traffic, >and these are already what we call "huge" lists. That's a bit as if INFO-VAX >mapped into the yearly benefits of IBM, LINKFAIL were those of DEC, etc. > > Eric May be, there are many VAXen in the world and all of there users need a lot of information to drive them. Wolfram WOFA@DB0FUB11 MAINT@DB0FUB11 EARNIE@DB0FUB11 (today)