In article <LSTSRV-L.89091016481188@CEARN>, Eric Thomas <ERIC@LEPICS> says: >4. You have to understand that each LISTSERV is running with the local > version of BITEARN NODES, and that in a number of cases this is very > old because the postmaster doesn't have time or is too lazy to update > it. LISTSERV@PSUVM can't know that, and has no reason to reject your > request. Well, being the postmaster mentioned here, let me apologize for any problems which may have occurred; the situation has been corrected. -Phil (trivia fact: we weren't lazy and we did have time, what did go wrong was that listserv ended up linked to the wrong disk after our vm/xa conversion so it wasn't seeing the updated file. What a waste, all that updating and nothing to notice it :-)