On Tue, 12 Sep 89 11:39:10 TUR Turgut Kalfaoglu said: >While the agreement is not signed by the majority, the sites who need to >have the new PEERS NAMES may do so by AFD'ing to TREARN's LISTSERV. >Regards, -turgut > Good. But wheter a site "needs" the new ones is a matter of definition - we've seen LISTSERVs running with pretty outdated BITEARN NODES, MAILERs with last centuries tables and sometimes the site didn't feel the need to have newer ones. Before I get beaten I'll interpret myself immediately: an up-to-date PEERS NAMES is for yourself and the rest of the world more than a nice-to-have if you run a backbone server. Turgut: Could you tell us - maybe better on an EARN List - how many and perhaps which sites already signed. Maybe this would helps the others in finding a decision in a shorter time. Christian