>If they run >LISTEARN will there be any problems communicating with the peer on >LISTSERV@GREARN? I'd like to stress that the LISTEARN 1.5o that we are distributing is compatible with the LISTSERV code, as far as 'talking to each other' goes. In fact, LISTEARN 1.5o is very similar to LISTSERV 1.5o with a few minor exceptions. These are: * Included 'failed mail' as a possible mailer rejection subject to prevent mailing loops. * The forwarded REVIEW command now fails if the list is locked. This was placed after having a loop with a badly-peered list. So, if the list is locked, the looping should stop. * Provision for forcing LISTEARN to answer some certain node's users in MAIL mode. Placed for nodes whose nodeID "look like" EARN/BITNET addresses. (Happens with local TCP/IP nodes, I was told) * Ability to order files from LISTSERV using the 'fn.ft' format, instead of 'fn ft' - useful for people on VAX, Unix, etc.. For the optional packages: * Forwarding: help menu if the command syntax is faulty. Regards, -turgut