On Thu, 26 Oct 89 23:02:33 GMT Eric Thomas said: >I have noticed, by pure chance, that EARN versions of PEERS NAMES (ie the one >that Turgut distributes to EARN sites) is not, as I had always thought, >identical to the one used for BITNET, despite what Turgut had originally said: > well, the situation is not that sneaky, or evilish :) since I am supposed to alter the EARN site's configuration in PEERS NAMES, this was the desired configuration. In fact, I never made them non-backbone on the EARN tables! During the last meeting, those sites have been notified of their "aged to a perfection" tables (sorry, couldn't help it), and right now I checked, and they are both recent again. I didn't write to you about it, because I didn't DO anything :) regards, -turgut-