>the first place that someone really thinks that Eric removed those site from >PEERS NAMES ! Forgetting this mis-information I would like to know *what* take it easy - it's a typo. When I talked about it at nog, you bet that I did not say that they were taken out entirely from the p.n. file. >one - considering that there is no agreement between BITNET and EARN about the >compatibility of LISTSERV and LISTEARN. If a such agreement could be signed, it would also nullify the need for a 'listgate', and the reduction of the service level provided with the listgate. It seems right now that no matter how we design listgate, somethings will be left out - simply because LISTSERV wasn't designed to have a listgate in the middle. -turgut