..oops! I sometimes hate the reply-to: tag.. Maybe we should tell this to someone: if the msg is forwarded, and is replied back, don't look at the reply-to tag? Anyway, my apologies.. Since now I found an opportunity, I can reply to another matter: I really mind the dirty talking, 'only 13 sites, and two later on declined' business - we work hard here for the code, so what if over 1/4 of the EARN servers sites have signed the contract? You must have seen the recent changes, like the path-bug and the BSMTP work.. It works fine here, but I need some test sites as well. Please let me know if you would volunteer to test it. Its net effect was pleasant here - the users no longer see their own net addresses on top of the msg, but the 'multiple recipients' thing, but listserv gets through a DIST job in a record time, with one copy to the mailer.. regards, -turgut