On Thu, 2 Nov 89 14:39:05 GMT Eric Thomas said: >know that VM/XA is not fully compatible with VM/SP, even in a 370 >machine, and that there are a number of things which had to be changed in >1.6 to solve minor, yet painful, problems. Even in 1.6c I found a problem >with incoming DISK DUMP files and had to write a fix that will go in >1.6d. I don't want to talk you into revealing "LISTSERV internal information" :-). But I think it could be of interest to the VM community in general to list (some of the) the incompabilities. To give two examples: * There is an additional line in the "CP QUERY <V> urdevice" response - saw an EXEC choke on it * Contents of the fields in the (simulated) SFBLOK returned by DIAG14 have changed (i.e. aren't here at all) But maybe such information should go to VMXA-L or that like. Christian