Well I couldn't reproduce this problem, but I know how to solve it: I will remove extended statistics from the next release, as they have basically become useless: 1. For lists with a non-negligible number of non-local recipients and non-negligible traffic, you should use DISTRIBUTE and in this case such statistics are not computed. 2. If the traffic is very low (like LCOORD-L@CEARN) you don't need to have extended statistics. 3. For lists with only local people you should not use DISTRIBUTE but the link.bytes value will be 0 since you are not sending anything outside the node. Extended stats cost a lot of CPU time to maintain and have become worthless through the introduction of domain-style addresses which cannot be used in the calculation. I would not be surprised if a lot of list owners used the 'Extended' option just because they copied it from another list, without understanding, or because they just want "more statistics" (ie they don't know what it means, but it means "more" and they want as much as they can). Let's save cycles and prevent people from drawing wrong conclusions from meaningless figures. Eric