I just got the following puzzlegram back from [log in to unmask] It seems to think I sent a duplicated posting, which I didn't. Also, I sent my post- ing to [log in to unmask] Comments, anyone? Terry Kennedy Operations Manager, Academic Computing [log in to unmask] St. Peter's College, US [log in to unmask] (201) 915-9381 From: IN%"[log in to unmask]" "Revised List Processor" 30-SEP-1990 02:16 :3 0.40 To: _TERRY CC: Subj: Rejected posting to JNET-L@ASUACAD Received: from ASUACAD.BITNET by SPCVXA.BITNET; Sun, 30 Sep 90 02:16 EDT Received: by ASUACAD (Mailer R2.07) id 4055; Sat, 29 Sep 90 23:15:15 MST Date: Sat, 29 Sep 90 23:14:50 MST From: Revised List Processor <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Rejected posting to JNET-L@ASUACAD To: [log in to unmask] Message-id: <[log in to unmask]> X-Envelope-to: TERRY Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it seems to have been already sent to the JNET-L list. That is, a message with identical body (but possibly different headers) has been posted to the list recently, either by you or by someone else. If you have a good reason to resend this message to the list (for instance because half of the outbound spool files were lost in a disk crash at some intermediate node), please alter the message text in some way before resending it. Note that altering the "Subject:" line or adding blank lines at the top or bottom of the message is not sufficient; you should instead add a line at the top explaining why you are re-sending the message, for the benefit of the list membership. ------------------------- Rejected message (27 lines) ------------------------- Received: by ASUACAD (Mailer R2.07) id 3759; Sat, 29 Sep 90 23:14:40 MST Date: Sat, 29 Sep 90 23:55:00 EDT Reply-To: JNET Discussion Group <[log in to unmask]> Sender: JNET Discussion Group <[log in to unmask]> From: "Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Problems between Vax 11/785 and IBM 4341 To: Bob Kaneshige <[log in to unmask]> > The problem may be that you have to set a physical switch on a DMF-32 so that > the autoconfigure portion of startup will not allocate these devices to the > XGDRIVER. It is documented in the BSC/370 manual on page 3-2: Additionally, you need to issue the appropriate commands to connect the BFDRIVER. These are normally found in JAN_SYS:JANLOAD.COM. For example, on my system that file contains: $ SYSGEN="$SYS$SYSTEM:SYSGEN" $ SYSGEN LOAD JAN_SYS:BFDRIVER $ SYSGEN CONNECT BFA0/CSR=%O760344/VECTOR=%O300 - /ADAPTER=UB0/NUMVEC=2/DRIVER=BFDRIVER Note that the values change depending on other hardware installed in the system. The Jnet manuals have more to say about this. Terry Kennedy Operations Manager, Academic Computing [log in to unmask] St. Peter's College, US [log in to unmask] (201) 915-9381