I did *not* repost this item, nor did I repost the other one with the same Resent-Subject = "Any ideas, anyone?". What's going on? REXXards. ;-) Scott/ ----------------------------Original message---------------------------- Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it seems to have been already sent to the REXXLIST list. That is, a message with identical body (but possibly different headers) has been posted to the list recently, either by you or by someone else. If you have a good reason to resend this message to the list (for instance because half of the outbound spool files were lost in a disk crash at some intermediate node), please alter the message text in some way before resending it. Note that altering the "Subject:" line or adding blank lines at the top or bottom of the message is not sufficient; you should instead add a line at the top explaining why you are re-sending the message, for the benefit of the list membership. ------------------------- Rejected message (33 lines) ------------------------- Received: from DEARN by OHSTVMA.IRCC.OHIO-STATE.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 7215; Tue, 06 Nov 90 18:53:14 EST Received: by DEARN (Mailer R2.07) id 9169; Wed, 07 Nov 90 00:52:32 CET Received: from HEARN.BITNET by DEARN (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 0626; Tue, 06 Nov 90 16:48:26 CET Received: by HEARN (Mailer R2.07) id 7769; Tue, 06 Nov 90 16:46:18 MET Received: from HDEDH1.BITNET by HEARN.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 7736; Tue, 06 Nov 90 16:43:54 MET Received: from HDEDH1.BITNET (NADWL) by HDEDH1.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 0790; Tue, 06 Nov 90 16:43:19 SET Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist Date: Tue, 6 Nov 90 16:42:18 SET Reply-To: VM/SP REXX Language Discussion List <REXXLIST@DEARN> Sender: VM/SP REXX Language Discussion List <REXXLIST@DEARN> From: Scott Ophof <NADWL@HDEDH1> Subject: re: IBM FORM SC26-4358-0 X-LSVRepTo: X-LSVopts: NOACK Org=REXXLIST@HEARN X-LSVvia: REXXLIST@HEARN REXXLIST@DEARN To: $PEER$ <REXXLIST@OHSTVMA> In-Reply-To: Message of Mon, 5 Nov 90 21:10:35 MEZ from <RZOTTO@DKNKURZ1> On Mon, 5 Nov 90 21:10:35 MEZ Otto Stolz +49 7531 88 2645 said: >... >Outside SAA (and IBM), there are REXX implementations for several more >platforms available, among them being "Personal REXX" (for MS-DOS), >Uni-REXX (for Unix on many hardware platforms), and Amiga-REXX. Has anyone heard of TREXX (Tandem)? REXXards. Scott/