On Fri, 21 Feb 1992 15:29:19 EST Ratilal Haria said: > >Since there seems to be lots of system out there who may have similar >problem, I am giving the solution that works. > >Mark Wilson ([log in to unmask]) suggested using LOOPCHECK=NONE >setting on each list that you control. Since I have only a few lists >I control it will do. But then your users will subscribe to some list on my Listserv, and you will come hat-in-hand to me, and ask me to change that list to LOOPCHECK=NONE, and I will refuse. Jim's point being that there are a lot of pain-in-the-neck postmasters like me who will refuse to run LOOPCHECK=NONE. We are tired of all the stupid games the mailers play with rejected mail, and will take the path that prevents runaway lists, and more complaints from users. > >Thanks again ... Ratilal /ahw