On Mon, 24 Feb 1992 13:12:59 CST Mark R. Williamson said:
>
>That's not quite what I said.  The exact quote was as follows:
>
>>You can change ......
>>.....   disable this feature (or at least make it default off).
>
 
 
Hi
 
  First of all I would like to apologize to Mark. He *did* mention
  the pros and cons as his previous mail mentions. I did not include
  it.
 
  Because the lists in question are local and controllable,
  I decided to go ahead. But judging from the flames and negative
  responses I am tempted to remove the LOOPCHECK flag.
 
  I had assumed that so long as the headers were left undisturbed,
  the body of the mail can contain any text and the LISTSERVER
  *will not* analyse/process it. But it does and if somebody can
   explain why it is checking the body.
 
   Below is an an example that (I think) is a perfectly valid mail
   and yet it is rejected by the LISTSERVER.
 
  I am relatively new  and don't the reasons about the creation of
  the LOOPCHECK as you experts and old timers do. I do not want to
  screw the network. But please do educate me onto why there can
  be loops if the text is in the body.
 
  Or is there an alternate solutions from the Listserver side
  (as opposed to user/Microsoft side of the problem cause it ain't easy).
 
Thanks again ... Ratilal :-(
 
 
======================================================================== 32
Received: by NRCVM01 (Mailer R2.08) id 6886; Tue, 25 Feb 92 12:18:57 EST
Date:         Tue, 25 Feb 1992 12:18:57 -0500
From:         Revised List Processor (1.7b) <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Delivery error notice sent to list LSTEST2
To:           "Ratilal Haria" <[log in to unmask]>
 
The enclosed mail file, found in the LSTEST2 reader and shown under the spoolid
8232  in the  console log,  has been  identified as  a possible  delivery error
notice  for  the following  reason:  "Sender:",  "From:" or  "Reply-To:"  field
pointing to the list has been found in mail body.
 
------------------------- Message in error (19 lines) -------------------------
Received: from NRCVM01 (SMTP) by VM.NRC.CA (Mailer R2.08) with BSMTP id 6876;
 Tue, 25 Feb 92 12:14:46 EST
Received: from coursmtp.nrc.ca by VM.NRC.CA (IBM VM SMTP V2R1) with TCP;
   Tue, 25 Feb 92 12:14:45 EST
Received: by coursmtp.nrc.ca with Microsoft Mail
	id <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 25 Feb 92 12:14:50 EST
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: test
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 92 12:14:00 EST
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Encoding: 5 TEXT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0 (beta-1)
 
offset the headers and see of listserver cares
 Reply-To:     <[log in to unmask]>
 Sender:       <[log in to unmask]>
this is a test
 
ú LISTSERV NRCVM01  2/25/92