From: Cristina Blanxer <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: My experiences with LISTEARN Comments: To: Darren Evans-Young <[log in to unmask]> In-Reply-To: Message of Thu, 3 Sep 1992 17:11:15 CDT from <[log in to unmask]> On Thu, 3 Sep 1992 17:11:15 CDT you said: > >Harry, > >You are not alone. I went through HELL trying to remove my IBM-MAIN >peer. I was never personally advised that EB0UB011 was going away. >I just happened to get wind of it through RELAY-L. It took me hours | Right, Darren. As the node is going to fade away, the server RELAY |was been shut down. | Let me tell you that you work stupidly more than you needed. It shows |that you don't have much work to do otherwise, you would have thougt |f a way of getting in contact with the postmaster of listserv, who |s SERVEMAN@EB0UB011, where i got nothing from you. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<DELETED TEXT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |I hope I don't have never more to work together, because it's a real |pain in the ***. | Sincerely yours: | Cristina Blanxer (postmaster of LISTSERV@EB0UB011, postmaster of LISTSERV@EBCESCA1) I find this a little disturbing, is this the expected reply or attitude that I am going to get from the postmaster when a problem arises. While I may not be entirely versed in the subject or the particular matter at hand I am concerned with the attitude of those I am likely to be working with at some future date. I work with a server and am still learning the ins and outs and it is likely that i will have to call upon the Postmaster from time to time, and I do not like being told that being a bit netter makes me a pain in the ****. I would have expected a more professional attitude from a postmaster, perhaps I have expected too much from one that is obiouslly not a *BITNET* netter. C.W. Turner GT2150@SIUCVMB (BITNET) [log in to unmask] (INTNET) [log in to unmask] (INTNET) [log in to unmask] (FREENET)