Were I the list owner, I would be more concerned about the fact that the two messages quoted appeared to be two copies of the same message (same "Date:" in addition to same "Subject:") and that the second copy seems to have made two trips through UKCC. Perhaps one of the links intended to be a peer doesn't have the string "peer distribution" in its name? (I can't tell because of "Review=Owner".) Might that or a REPRO setting be interfering with proper peer distribution? Mark R. Williamson, Rice U., Houston TX; [log in to unmask] or @RICEVM1