As one of the more experienced LISTSERV Postmasters and List Owners, I would not like to see LSTOWN-L broken into 'novice/veteran' lists. I would not want to have to make the personal decision of following another list ('novice') with the large number of lists I already follow. I think LSTOWN-L can be useful for both novice and veteran LISTSERV list owners. If we're taking a vote, and I *hope* we're not, I vote 'no' for the 2 different list idea. Please, let's get this list back on topic and continue to help each other better manage our LISTSERV lists and therefore better serve our customers. BTW, when referrinf to LISTSERV in writing, please *always* capitalize it. LISTSERV is LISTSERV, not ListServ, not Listserv, not Listserve, not listserv, not (well, you get my drift ;-) ). Thanks for reading this note (seems I've been infected with John's "Saturday Morning Let's Catch Up On List Mail" bug too. Jim Gerland - Consultant, Network User Support University at Buffalo Academic Services, Computing & Information Technology Buffalo, NY 14260 716.645.3557 Work 716.645.3734 FAX [log in to unmask] [log in to unmask]