How did the personal reply I sent to Melvin Klassen end up on LSTOWN-L?? Here are the headers in the note it was in reply to: > From [log in to unmask] Fri Mar 19 12:30:55 1993 > Return-Path: <@UVVM.UVIC.CA:[log in to unmask]> > Received: from UVVM (NJE origin KLASSEN@UVVM) by UVVM.UVIC.CA (LMail > V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 2684; Fri, 19 Mar 1993 10:29:09 -0800 > Date: Fri, 19 Mar 93 10:22:24 PST > From: Melvin Klassen <KLASSEN@UVVM> > Organization: University of Victoria > Subject: Re: Vanishing List Mail > To: Natalie Maynor <maynor@MSSTATE> > In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 19 Mar 1993 05:52:50 CST And when I entered the 'r' command, I checked the address it popped up -- as I always try to do in order to avoid an e-oops. Not only that, I used the ~h command to add .bitnet to his address as it appeared in the header of the reply. That reply went to Melvin, not to LSTOWN-L. So *how* did it end up being distributed to the list?? If it went only to Melvin, that must mean.... Never mind. I think it's pretty obvious what it means. I don't really mind that my anger at Melvin, who has been bugging me for the past couple of years, was blasted around the world. I do, however, find it highly annoying to think that something I did not send to a list got sent to it through trickery. --Natalie ([log in to unmask])