TD>TS]WW>projected release date for OS/2 2.1 is? TD>TS]My guess is COMDEX. There are a number of advantages of releasing it TD>TS]then, and it looks like an attainable goal. TD> I =really= hope they don't. What =I= feel is necessary for OS/2 to TD> succeed is for it to be somewhat "idiot-proof". While all of us have I'm not sure if it will ever be idiot-proof. DOS 5 is idiot-proof because it's (relative to any modern OS) an idiot-OS. The only thing it HAS to do is manage your disk. Everything else is incidental or can be/is handled by another product or even application software. TD> was virtually bullet-proof> or we're toast, IMO. What's the big TD> hurry anyway...as the days go by, the reports of NT <which I feel TD> isn't really going to go head-to-head with 2.1> lead me to believe TD> that NT's going to have a lot of problems if they ship it like this. IBM really needs to release at COMDEX- first off it'll let them show an almost completely redone version just over a year after initial release- that shows commitment. Next it'll be a kick in the butt to NT, since it'll still be vaporware while IBM is passing out copies of 2.1. Finally, the press coverage at COMDEX would be a major boost. Especially if IBM pushes the Windows 3.1 emulation. TD> Wow, imagine if both MS =and= IBM release versions at the same time TD> with too many bugs! 2.1 has VERY few bugs now. Particularly compared to 2.0. I agree that it could be more end-user friendly (vs power-user friendly), but that may not happen for awhile. Requires a lot of rewriting- most documentation. Tom Sorensen --- ~ QMPro 1.02 ~ This tagline returned for revision ~ ILink: The Data Dimension z Norcross, GA z 404-921-1186