From: Paul Robinson <[log in to unmask]> Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA ----- George Frajkor <[log in to unmask]>, writes: [Text edited] (for the tekkies among us, here follows the bounce. there is no user 100012.674 on the list at all, and the only other users with compuserve addresses give the list no problems.) Received: from UBVM.cc.buffalo.edu by alfred.ccs.carleton.ca (4.1/SMI-4.0) Received: from rhino.cis.vutbr.cz by alfred.ccs.carleton.ca Well, until I realized your site is Carleton.CA I thought that there's the point. Do all of your messages go through "alfred", or just some of them? You can use a test mailing and see who it is. Take the mailing list for the list that you are having a problem with. Tack onto each user the line number they are on, or put a unique code. Then take this list and feed it into a distribute mail script, like this: //SEND JOB ECHO=NO DISTRIBUTE MAIL //TO DD * [log in to unmask] 001 [log in to unmask] 002 /* //DATA DD * Date: Mon, Feb 31, 1996 24:10:15 (-2600) From: Who I am <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Test Message To: A number of recipients have been getting bounced mail. If you receive this message, you may ignore it. If your address is bad, this message will be returned to me and I will be able to find out where the problem is. Please do not reply to this message as I might think your address is bad and delete you from some lists you are on. /* //send EOJ Mail this (from address 'list-manager') to your nearest LISTSERV that can handle distributions. The bounces should tell you who is failing. If you still can't find out who the bounces are, take the same list, assuming you can see what your "personal name" is on an incoming message (see below for what I mean), but using an editor or a program, have it take every entry in the list and send a single message, like this: //JOB001 JOB ECHO=NO DISTRIBUTE MAIL //TO DD * [log in to unmask] Charles Zykowicz /* //DATA DD * Date: Mon, Feb 31, 1996 24:10:15 (-2600) From: Error 001 <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Test To: Test - Ignore /* //JOB001 EOJ //JOB002 JOB ECHO=NO DISTRIBUTE MAIL //TO DD * [log in to unmask] Jack Ryan /* //DATA DD * Date: Mon, Feb 31, 1996 24:10:15 (-2600) From: Error 002 <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Test To: Test - Ignore /* //JOB0002 EOJ //JOB0003 JOB ECHO=NO And so on for 20 or 50 or 2000 recipients, if you have to. You take this as one file, and submit this to listserv. If it's a very large file, break it into pieces of, say, 100 entries and send it to several listservers so as to reduce the overhead on the network, or do it at 2 in the morning. Or both. Note, one requirement of this is that the Personal Name that is sent to must be visible to you for the second option to work. What that means is that when a bounce message comes back, it should be marked with "ERROR 009" as the name of the recipient. If your mailer won't do this, then you have a problem. For example, my precise account on MCI Mail is "0005066432" and it can be addressed as either "[log in to unmask]" (That is what is sent out on a message transmitted) or by the identifier for the account, "[log in to unmask]". Both point to the same mailbox and if you send a message to either address they both go the same place; the only problem is that if you send a message to TO: Paul Robinson <[log in to unmask]> TO: Paul <[log in to unmask]> TO: [log in to unmask] Do you know what *I* see? This is what MCI Mail *always* shows: TO: * Tansin A. Darcos & Company / MCI ID: 506-6432 It does not matter what the "personal name" is on messages sent to me; I never see it. So to use method two, your system has to allow you to see them. --- Paul Robinson - [log in to unmask] ----- The following Automatic Fortune Cookie was selected only for this message: I'd love to go out with you, but the last time I went out, I never came back.