On Mon, 28 Jun 1993 17:06:36 +0200 Eric Thomas said: >On Mon, 28 Jun 1993 00:42:15 -0400 Chris Lewis <[log in to unmask]> >said: > >Interesting... However, before I make any change to the code I need some >sort of formal assurance that these tags are indeed present in all >(conformant) usenet messages, and are not part of any current RFC822 >extension. In fact, I am pretty sure I have seen messages without >'Supersedes:' or 'Archive-Name:' (I understand you were addressing the >particular problems of FAQ, but I'd like a solution that works for all >usenet messages, rather than just FAQ files). Normally, I wouldn't even ask this, but since you're looking at doing something with the code anyway, I don't think it'ld hurt to mention this. One of the most popular newsreader software packages, trn, has what I consider to be a fairly serious bug. It is seen when the poster either sends a reply, forwards to another user, or posts to a moderated newsgroup (in all cases, trn sends the post out via mail). What happens is that a blank line is put in the middle of what should be the header. Some of the more important tags lost in the bottom half are the From: and Subject: tags. An additional From tag *is* inserted in the top part of the header, but it's address is not that of the sender (rather it is usually something like [log in to unmask]). Any attempt at replying to the sender via "normal" methods goes back to the news administrator at the site instead of the "real" user. I know this isn't a LMAIL problem, but is there something that can be done on the receiver's side (ie. the Lmail side) to 'fix' the incomming mail message? Something like looking to see if there is a block of text that contains nothing but valid header stuff, deleteing the blank line in the middle of the header, and deleting any bogus header tags (such as the "wrong" From: tag). I know that it probably isn't possible since there may be mua's that do this for valid reasons (although I can't for the life of me figure out why), and that it may be impossible to tell which tag is the valid one when repeats *do* occur. Perhaps, I'm just vending my frustration here since I posted this bug report to news.software.readers and was throughly ignored! ----------------------------------------------------- Chris Barnes | President - Bryan/College Station [log in to unmask] | Retriever Club (409) 846-3273 (home) | "Dedicated to the betterment of (409) 845-8300 (work) | the retrieving breeds"