Eric Thomas <[log in to unmask]> wrote on Mon, 15 Nov 1993 18:39: > [...] > I frankly don't understand what this is supposed to mean. There is no > relationship between the structure of the BITNET core and the amount of > CPU time or disk space used up by LISTSERV, unless you start counting > individual kilobytes. There is a version of LISTSERV that can work > without NJE. L-Soft announced a joint study a couple weeks ago through > which this new version will be tested in production on several sites. It > will definitely be available by July; all the code has been written, it > just needs to be tested in a real-life situation and debugged as > necessary. The point is if LISTSERV will run on some sort of Unix box, Rice and many others are simply going to dump their mainframe... Is L-Soft also going to implement a (true) Unix listserv sometime in the future? +gg -- Gerhard Gonter //////// CyberSpace <[log in to unmask]> Tel: +43/1/31336/4111 //// the final //// <[log in to unmask]> Fax: +43/1/31336/702 frontier ////////// <[log in to unmask]>