I have received about 140+ delivery error report from VMTECSLP.SLP.ITESM.MX's MAILER (The original message is attached at the end.) I could not figure out why this happened. I appreciate if you all can help me to figure out why. Thanks in advance. Dustin Fu Academic Computing Services U of Tx at Arlington ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~original message~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Return-Path: <@UTARLVM1.UTA.EDU:[log in to unmask]> Received: from UTARLVM1.UTA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UTARLVM1) by UTARLVM1.UTA.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 8660; Wed, 17 Nov 1993 14:43:22 -0600 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1993 14:43:22 -0600 From: BITNET list server at UTARLVM1 (1.7f) <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Delivery error report from VMTECSLP.SLP.ITESM.MX To: Dustin Fu <[log in to unmask]> X-LSV-ListID: None The enclosed mail file, found in the LISTSERV reader and shown under the spoolid 3519 in the console log, has been identified as a possible delivery error notice for the following reason: mail origin seems to be a mailer or mail-daemon. ------------------------- Message in error (43 lines) ------------------------- Return-Path: <> Received: from VMTECSLP.SLP.ITESM.MX (NJE origin MAILER@VMTECSLP) by UTARLVM1.UTA.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 8658; Wed, 17 Nov 1993 14:43:19 -0600 Received: from VMTECSLP.SLP.ITESM.MX (NJE origin MAILER@VMTECSLP) by VMTECSLP.SLP.ITESM.MX (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 0027; Wed, 17 Nov 1993 14:43:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1993 14:41:09 -0400 Reply-To: [log in to unmask] From: RFC822 mailer (LMail release 1.1d/1.7f) <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Undelivered mail - RFC822 parser log To: [log in to unmask] Your message was rejected by the RFC822 parser. The following errors were reported by the parser: <W> Invalid RFC822 field - "//RMUSIC-L JOB Echo=No,Reply-to="[log in to unmask]"". Rest of header flushed. <E> "From:"/"Sender:" field is missing. ------------------------- Rejected message (22 lines) ------------------------- //RMUSIC-L JOB Echo=No,Reply-to="[log in to unmask]" //To DD * A15919 ITESO BSMTP GY195002 ITESMVF1 BSMTP /* // DIST2 MAIL I=Y FROM=RMUSIC-L@GITVM1 FORW(CRC) HOST(273 288) PATH(273: 288:) //Via DD "GITVM1 UGA RICEVM1 UTARLVM1" //CRC DD "2-86CE43BE" //Data DD *,EOF Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1993 09:48:42 -0800 Reply-To: Music Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> Sender: Music Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> From: Uncle Scott <[log in to unmask]> Subject: That "O" thing. To: Multiple recipients of list RMUSIC-L <[log in to unmask]> I've seen in postings for a while the use of an "O" at the end of a word or too. It's suttle, almost subliminalO. When I read it out loud, it sounds kinda funnyO. Just Curious, Uncle Scotty.