Some of the members of the list CSINFO-L@CSEARN are complaining about the returning non distributed mails from the list ( if there is an error in delivering mail the returned mail goes also to the author of the mail not only to the person that was specified in "Errors-to:" key. ) They say that it is because there is not standard header Errors-to. Although I tried to simulate such situation but I was not able to do it. I am afraid I have made something wrong in setup of list. Can you advise me what should I do to avoid such situation? Thank you very much Ingrid Ledererova Here is the example of such returned mail: > Received: from earn.cvut.cz by sun2.fzu.cz with SMTP id AA01188 > (5.67a8/IDA-1.5 for <[log in to unmask]>); Mon, 3 Jan 1994 12:48:34 +0100 > Received: from fafukhk.faf.cuni.cz by earn.cvut.cz (IBM VM SMTP V2R1) with TCP; > Mon, 03 Jan 94 12:54:14 MET > Received: from FAF1.FAF.CUNI.CZ (faf1) by fafukhk.faf.cuni.cz (5.67a8/Ultrix4.2a) > id AA05776; Mon, 3 Jan 1994 12:51:04 GMT > Date: Mon, 3 Jan 1994 12:51:04 GMT > From: [log in to unmask] (Mail Delivery Subsystem) > Subject: Returned mail: User unknown > Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] > X-Charset: ASCII > X-Char-Esc: 29 > Status: RO > > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- > While talking to nsfnet-relay.ac.uk: > >>> RCPT To:<[log in to unmask]> > <<< 550 Unknown domain 'brad.ac.uk' > 550 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown > > ----- Recipients of this delivery ----- > Bounced, cannot deliver: > <[log in to unmask]> > > ----- Unsent message follows ----- > Received: from FAF1.FAF.CUNI.CZ (faf1) by fafukhk.faf.cuni.cz (5.67a8/Ultrix4.2a) > id AA05774; Mon, 3 Jan 1994 12:51:04 GMT > Received: from FAF1/MAILQUEUE by FAF1.FAF.CUNI.CZ (Mercury 1.11); > Mon, 3 Jan 94 12:53:15 +0100 (MET) > Received: from MAILQUEUE by FAF1 (Mercury 1.11); Mon, 3 Jan 94 12:53:04 +0100 (MET) > Received: from FAF1/MAILQUEUE by FAF1.FAF.CUNI.CZ (Mercury 1.11) > for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 3 Jan 94 12:53:04 +0100 (MET) > Resent-From: [log in to unmask] > Resent-To: [log in to unmask] > Resent-Date: Mon, 3 Jan 94 12:53:04 +0100 (MET) > Received: from earn.cvut.cz by FAF1.FAF.CUNI.CZ (Mercury 1.11); > Mon, 3 Jan 94 12:52:51 +0100 (MET) > Received: from EARN.CVUT.CZ by earn.cvut.cz (IBM VM SMTP V2R1) > with BSMTP id 8736; Mon, 03 Jan 94 12:49:31 MET > Received: from EARN.CVUT.CZ (NJE origin LISTSERV@CSEARN) by EARN.CVUT.CZ (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8721; Mon, 3 Jan 1994 12:46:43 +0000 > Date: Mon, 3 Jan 1994 12:39:56 +0100 > Reply-To: Diskuse o mistnich problemech v siti <[log in to unmask]> > Sender: Diskuse o mistnich problemech v siti <[log in to unmask]> > From: Fiala Tomas <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Cena "ULTRA" > Comments: To: [log in to unmask] > To: Multiple recipients of list CSINFO-L <[log in to unmask]> > Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]> > X-Charset: ASCII > X-Char-Esc: 29 > > Jaka je "spravna" cena desky SMC ULTRA ? Mam nabidku od firmy ....