On Wed, 25 May 1994 13:21:36 EDT Wes Morgan <ENGR.UKY.EDU> wrote: > > For those of you performing preemptive filtering, > here's the updated list of addresses from which the flood may come: > > [log in to unmask] > [log in to unmask] > [log in to unmask] > [log in to unmask] > [log in to unmask] > [log in to unmask] > [log in to unmask] > [log in to unmask] > [log in to unmask] > [log in to unmask] > *@pericles.com > *@cybersell.pericles.com Looking at the last two IDs above, I would use the single entry: *@*PERICLES.COM rather than those two IDs. P.S. Has anybody **SUCCESSFULLY** "ping"-ed the host 'PERICLES.COM' ??? All I get is "host unreachable" from the nearest NSFNET gateway. To me, that implies that IP packets cannot be routed to the host, i.e., the host's IP-address is known, but it's totally inaccessible. P.P.S. Can we terminate this discussion, until they *do* post something? All this chatter is worse than any as-yet-imaginary offense. :-(