On Fri, 30 Sep 1994 19:11:33 -0500 Natalie Maynor <[log in to unmask]> said: >So LISTSERV assumes I know what I'm doing when I add but assumes I don't >know what I'm doing when I delete or set nomail. Interesting. When you add a user, LISTSERV assumes you know what address it is you want to add. The reasons are (1) users who are already subscribed to the list seldom ask the owner to be subscribed a second time and (2) there may be cases where it is useful to have the two addresses, and if ADD refused to add the second one it would be impossible to do it. When you delete a user, LISTSERV assumes you want all equivalent entries removed. The reasons are (1) most of the time, you're deleting a user because you get a bounce, which may or may not be reported under the exact same address that you used in the list and (2) the only drawback is that, in the rare cases where you do want the two entries, you have to issue an extra ADD command after the DELETE, whereas otherwise you would have to feed the exact address whenever you do a DELETE. Thousands of people get deleted every day, maybe 2-3 get dual-added. The decision is easy to make. What you're trying to do is not normal, recommended behaviour. It requires an extra ADD command. LISTSERV doesn't read brain waves and can't know whether you really mean to delete just one entry or both. Since in 99.x% of cases you want to "just remove" the subscriber from the list, that's what LISTSERV does. >Oh for the good old days before our bitnet-internet equivalency was >registered... Well, in these days you used to complain about the inefficiency of BITNET and I used to remind you that most BITNET users do not have a UREP based setup. Now you want to use your BITNET address because the Internet address is slow. Make up your mind :-) Eric