Doug "Goes beyond the call of duty :-)" Winship <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > So I switch to Elm and use the "bounce" feature. Unless they study > the full header the subscribers never know it came through me. > Drawback is I don't get a copy of the message when it is distributed, > even though I'm subscribed. Eric explained it to me (he set up a test > list at SEARN for me to try it out and he could see what was happening) > but I don't remember the details, something about an improper Resent: > field or something like that. But it does work reasonably well. I (but not my 3 co-owners, to my knowledge) have the same problem of not getting a copy of the bounced message. I needed the confirmation of distribution so much that I'm now subscribed twice to the list: [log in to unmask] (Nomail), and [log in to unmask] (Mail). Not everyone's system will allow such gamesplaying, but it helps me to know that the message *actually got thru*. En paz, Steve -- Stephen W. Thompson, U. of PA, Data Administration, 215-898-1236 E-mail (MIME): [log in to unmask] (http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~st/st.html) (For security matters, use [log in to unmask], read by Data Admin. staff) ** Being angry doesn't mean you hate someone; it just means you're angry. **