> LISTSERV tolerates warnings for mail posted to a list. After all, human > beings are going to read it, and they have the option of using their > brains to figure out what was meant. LISTSERV does not, however, tolerate > warnings for messages containing commands that have to be executed. In > this case it would probably have worked out ok, in other cases it could > have led to incorrect results, possibly a loop, etc. > > Eric I understand your position and think that it's reasonable. However, I do believe that the message sent to the LISTSERV postmasters ought to clearly indicate that the commands were not processed. It suggests the opposite now.