There seems to be an unnecessary association of: Printed manual = Comprehensive, well laid out, well organized, professionally done manual, with indices, table of contents, etc. On-line manual = Random assortment of files with random pieces of useful information, but considerably less well organized (sort of like we have now). I don't consider the above description of "on-line manual" to be a manual--it's an assortment of random useful data that tries to compensate for the absence of a manual. If there were a true manual, then an on-line version could be available in "straight-text" and PostScript forms, and clearly a printed version could be easily created (not so easily the other way around). I do hope, BTW, that L-Soft's current efforts in creating a manual will be to create a _real_ one. (It is rather surprising that a commercial product does not have one, and a rather time-consuming process--both on the parts of requesters and the kind respondents on this list--to get answers to simple questions. I'd like to see this list evolve to addressing the real esoteric problems that cannot be anticipated, or are configuration dependent, or whatever, but that cannot happen till there is a real manual. As an example, although the Keywords documents is comprehensive in the list of keywords supported, it is excessively and unnecessarily terse about what each one does. And there are some things that are simply not explained anywhere other than through a rather cryptic (to the uninitiated) and cumbersome process of looking up archives to see if anyone has ever asked that question before. Shahrukh Merchant