In reply to Lucinda, I am apprehensieve that this is just useless posturing as there has already been a court decision on privacy and ownership or copyright of material on the internet. No matter how frivolous, the case proves that material cannot be copyrighted and that such material can be used for purposes like court presentation etc. because that was the case in question. The fact that material can be presented in court in an indictment against you usually means fairly conclusively that all copyright etc is lost. At any rate, the procedure would be to cite the precedent which is the basis of US and British law. -- Paul. -- Dr. Paul S. di Virgilio, University of Toronto [log in to unmask]