> I think Pete has reversed "latter" and "former," but my real > problem with his solution is that my list has more than 3500 subscribers, > and his solution isn't really practical for so large a list. I wish there > were a command I could send to LISTSERV that would send me back a list of > just those subscribers with certain options--for example, just those who > are concealed, or just those set to NOMAIL. I don't know how difficult > that would be to implement, Eric, but I for one would welcome such a > feature. Joan, me too...I'm just curious about one thing; if you were to send to listserv the command quiet set wmst-l noconceal for *@* would that return you a list of the people affected (ie those set to conceal), or would it not do anything? Jeff