[From the minutes of the last EARN-RPG group, which I was unfortunately unable to attend] > One agenda item added at the request of M. Gettes to discuss non member > sites using members' LISTSERV backbone. > > (...) > > 7a. Non-member Usage of Core Services > > A concern was raised about the current possibilty that non-member > sites are benefitting from core services. Specifically, if a > non-member site is running Listserv and is listed in the SERVICE > NAMES file, then it will send DISTRIBUTE jobs via the BITNET/EARN > Listserv core. Among the possible solutions discussed were: to do > nothing, charge non-member sites, charge L-soft, or ask L-soft for > other solutions. The general consensus was that the entire concern > should be referred to the EARN board for consideration. This whole item came as a shock to me. Both because L-Soft is being accused and noone had informed me that this discussion had taken place or that this concern was being brought to the EARN board or even existed, and because the underlying implications are staggering. Last time I checked, the EARN core was run on machines generously provided by EARN members using manpower provided by EARN members. EARN does not pay in any way for the resources used to run the core and I just can't believe that EARN feels it is in a position to charge for the use of other people's machine and time. Aside from not having any legal basis, I am sure that the sites donating LISTSERV cycles for backbone operations would be delighted to hear that EARN is proposing to charge L-Soft (and thus charge them indirectly, because L-Soft's money obviously comes from its customers) for the privilege of providing these backbone services, simply because EARN somehow feels it is unfair that some people are finding it more advantageous to purchase LISTSERV-TCP/IP and leave EARN, depriving EARN of some needed revenue. I'm sorry folks, but this is what you call a "free country". Things just don't work that way in free countries. People are free to run the software they want on their machines and donate or not donate cycles as they see fit. Anyway, since this appears to be a serious concern, L-Soft is going to modify LISTSERV to address EARN's concerns in the next release, which is due in a month or two. If this concern had been brought to my attention before, it would have been addressed earlier. I hope that this concludes this ridiculous exchange to EARN's satisfaction. Eric