Example of what happens with dualhdr; the ---Information--- section is what gets added. >From IN%"[log in to unmask]" "LISTSERV give-and-take forum" > 7-MAR-1995 14:40:25.78 >To IN%"[log in to unmask]" "Multiple recipients of list LSTSRV-L" >CC: >Subj: RE: Header > Question > >---------------------- Information from the mail header ----------------------- >Sender: LISTSERV give-and-take forum <[log in to unmask]> >Poster: "S. PETE HOYLE" <[log in to unmask]> >Organization: Information Technology >Subject: Re: Header > Question >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >A note dated Tue, 7 Mar 1995 08:09:37 -0800 asked: >> To: Multiple recipients of list LSTSRV-L [rest of Pete Hoyle's note deleted] >Finally, the "Dual" header option causes the listserv to make an >extra copy of the headers in the body of the note. This is invaluable >for people who are forced to use crippled mail systems that insist on >throwing away certain header lines. The most usual of these either do In our case, the mailer *can* be set to include the full address path, but so few people want it that the postmaster can't see his way clear to setting it that way for *all* the people in this organization. I can see his point, alas. Nonetheless, I prefer not to think of it as a broken or crippled mailer, just a setting that, for the rest of the organization, is perfectly splendid, but for me is perfectly dreadful. And that's the way it goes. >placing the extra copy of the headers in the body where (with luck) >the mailer will not delete the information. Our mailer allows dualhdr; I tried the other settings -- no luck. And, of course, crippled "listserv" type programs (i.e., programs that are *like* Listserv (TM) but aren't Listserv (TM) itself) haven't got the option in the first place. *That* is where I am *completely* blind. > Pete Hoyle - William & Mary Technology Services Computing Support Mario Rups [log in to unmask]