As list owner, I lsvput listname logxxxx, but got back from LISTSERV: File "listname LOG9501" is unknown to LISTSERV, PUT request rejected. "listname" of course was substituted with the real name; and there was no pre-existing LOG9501 on listname. This is LISTSERV 1.8a So, does Eric's solution (far below) imply that: 1) I shouldn't use LSVPUT (as list owner), or 2) that I must be LISTSERV administrator and PUT the LOGs, or 3) that the list _must_ be name xxxx-L (i.e, _with_ a "-L"), and _cannot_ be named something like xxxxxx (i.e, without the "-L" suffix, which is the case for the list in question)? If 1 or 3, then how do I do it? Peter - - - - - - - >From: Eric Thomas <[log in to unmask]> >Subject: Re: Adding LOGxxxx files >You can just PUT the logs, *without* defining them in the FILELIST. They >will be recognized automatically as logs, provided you use the correct >naming convention (xxxx-L LOGyymm).