In article <[log in to unmask]>, Eric Thomas <[log in to unmask]> says: > >On Mon, 29 May 1995 10:31:28 +0200 Herman Van Uytven ><[log in to unmask]> said: > >>Listserv seems to reply to the address is the Sender field. This seems >>not correct to me, although I guess there is a good technical or >>historical reason. > >Why does it seem incorrect? :-) I thought there was a rule in RFC822 that says: if there is a reply-to field, reply should go to this address if there is no reply-to field, reply should go to the sender address if there is neither a reply-to or a sender field, reply should go to the from address So why shouldn't this scheme be followed for mails to the listserv machine ? -Herman-