[Sorry about joining the discussion late--I'm not a subscriber to this list, but I often search the archives. Please CC: replies to me personally (or send directly). I will also keep an eye on the archives. Thanks.] Last week "A. Ralph Papakhian" <PAPAKHI@IUBVM> inquired about a subscriber remaining on the Daily error monitoring report despite surpassing the threshhold for number of error messages (coincidentally the address being monitored had also greatly exceeded the time threshhold as well). In that particular case, the subscriber wasn't on the list under the form of address given on the report and the advice given was to delete the subscriber manually under the address actually subscribed. I am having the same problem in spades (as the saying goes). I have multiple subscribers who have exceeded both the count threshhold *and* the time threshhold, yet are still on the report (i.e. still subscribed). In my case, however, the address subscribed matches the address on the report (although I don't think this has anything to do with the problem). Is anyone else having similar problems? If I delete these subscribers manually (which I could do, but then what is the point of getting the report, except to filter out the error messages and compile the list in a neat form once a day?), will they still appear? In both Ralph's case and mine, doesn't the section which states "Note: manually deleted subscribers may remain on the monitoring report under an alias address. Such entries will expire eventually; you do not need to do anything about them." apply? Just how long/how many errors is "eventually"? In my case, I thought that perhaps changing the settings had upset something (I changed the count threshhold), but once the time threshhold had been exceeded (which I hadn't changed), I'm beginning to wonder if these subscribers will *ever* be deleted. Spencer M. Anspach SLAJOB@IUBVM Listowner