I misserd all of this, but I too am turning my materials over to a lawyer as it is the better way as Eric pointed out. -- Paul. > This is just a reminder that, in a few hours, we, the members of the > "Keep LST*-L Clean" class action suit ("We"), will be expecting (1) ALL > discussions related to spams, other than side comments that are (i) > short, (ii) to the point and (iii) non-soapboxish in nature, to take > place on the new SPAM-L list. In particular, We will be expecting (2) all > copies of spams that We may have been unfortunate enough to miss due to > the spam filter getting in the way of our collective enjoyment to be > reposted exclusively to SPAM-L. Let it hereby be known that (3) We have > obtained a restraining order allowing us to actually kick people off > either or both list, or any combination thereof, for a period of 1 (one) > week if We see (i) spams forwarded to LSTSRV-L or LSTOWN-L or (ii) "I saw > it on XYZ-L as well!" messages resulting from unfortunate occurrences of > the actions described in Section 3(i), or any reasonable interpretation > thereof, including, without limitation, the "Delete First And Ask > Questions Later" act of 1986, and its subsequent revisions. > > Eric > - -- Dr. Paul S. di Virgilio, University of Toronto [log in to unmask]