--- Mandatory headers / Eugenio Gatto. - Torino, 1996-02-12 Albeit I approved the enclosed message (OK mechanism), it wasn't distributed. OK was honoured, I did receive the standard "Message successfully approved", and a second OK found no message with that code to approve. Can the lack of a DATE field prevent LISTSERV distribution, with no further warning to owners or editors ? A passing note deserves perhaps the form (novel to me) of Eudora forward (a sort of bounce with no RESENT- fields) documented by FROM field: RFC.822 compliant, but inhibiting the ordinary behaviour of a "self-moderated" list (as our one is, and the forwarder is indeed a subscriber). Thanks in advance. I miei saluti. <-- EG <[log in to unmask]>, <[log in to unmask]> This message was originally submitted by [log in to unmask] to the AIB-CUR list at ICINECA.CINECA.IT. You can approve it using the "OK" mechanism, [...] ------------------------ Original message (38 lines) -------------------------- Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]> [...] X-Sender: [log in to unmask] X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 To: [log in to unmask] From: Nunzia Spiccia <[log in to unmask]> (by way of Eleonora Rodi <[log in to unmask]>) [...]