> >I hope it doesn't unduly fragment the discussion. Are there really > >that many things to talk about that are unique to the NT environment? > > Perhaps not to the NT environment, but certainly to the migration from > one platform to NT. Given the number of subscribers (16) joining the > list in just one day, I'd say that a number of others feel the list > is worthwhile, too. One of the 16 was me, but don't count me as endorsing the idea of another list. > >Sometimes it's hard enough to figure out whether something should be on > >LSTSRV-L or LSTOWN-L. > > The discussion of doing migrations is definitely more pertinent to > LSTSRV-L than LSTOWN-L. However, there are those of us on DIGEST > who don't want to wade through (or save) entire digests just to keep > one piece of information pertinent to migration. There's also the > concept of trying to document the trials and tribulations of actually > doing a migration that will (with luck) be helpful to those following > behind and perhaps also to Nathan who is trying to write the LISTSERV > Maintainer's manual which has a chapter devoted to migration. > > From a personal standpoint, I'm looking for people to share information > in order to help our migration go more smoothly and also to let other > people know what I've found out. If a number of us band together, > we may be able to create something of a standardized procedure out > of the migration. Well, we are doing a migration too, but it's to the Unix version, not NT. However, many of the things we've found out apply to any version of LISTSERV, not just to Unix. I won't be posting those or anything new we find out to the NT list. If I do post, it will be to LSTSRV-L.