In article <[log in to unmask]>, "David G. McDivitt" <[log in to unmask]> says: > > (...) Because most people almost certainly respond >back to the list with a message, and rarely to the individual who sent >it, this should be set to "list,ignore" most of the time. Few people >realize putting something in the "reply-to" on their mailer will screw up >responses to their messages on the list. I've never seen that said >anywhere. For this reason, "list,ignore" is more appropriate. Many times >I have responded automatically, without even considering it wasn't going >back to the list it came from, because I seldom look at the reply-to on >an individual message. Sorry, I don't agree. In my experience with those lists that do configure REPLY-TO= LIST,RESPECT, there are very few (if any) original posters who use a REPLY-TO: RFC822 header who did not mean to do so. Therefore unless you have some exceptional requirements for the running of your list, then I suggest that you don't use the IGNORE option. /Pete Weiss at Penn State