On Fri, 21 Jun 1996 19:07:34 GMT Daniel A. Norton said: >Isn't that what INDEX is for? Well, INDEX is useless if the list doesn't keep archives. That aside, my personal opinion about INDEX is that it's a waste of time if you typically always read a few posts out of most digests - it's much easier to just get each digest and search for what you want. I don't mean to debate it - I just wanted to mention what people have requested. In other words, I don't have strong feelings about it. The way the INDEX files are set up I can kludge things to include the poster's address if it ever became a serious issue, but I'd rather not, obviously. I'm sure LSoft can decide if there's any merit to the request based upon feedback directly to them. Bill