>Kind of... I'm trying to formulate a policy for my lists re >"deferred" mail, and I want it to be reasonably fair, but basically >I want to tell people with sites that chronically "defer" that >they will have to get another ISP if they want to remain >subscribed. > >I know this may be drastic, but I'm sick of dealing with this >problem. There's a difference between a site that is doing >maintenance (or whatever) and that defers for a few hours once >a month or so, and a site that defers mail every day. And I >also get tired of responding to the subscribers from those >sites who want to know why their mail was late, or out-of-order, Ruth, put something in your welcome message about it. Refer them back to THAT. For addresses that perpetually offend, I delete 'em. We have a large list, and I can't stand the error mail building up. Just my opinion. : ) K Kathleen B. Bruce, BSN, IBCLC co-owner Lactnet, LLLOL, Corgi-L Independent Consultant with Excellent Sense of Humor : D LACTNET WWW site: http://www.mcs.com/~auerbach/lactation.html LACTNET archives http://library.ummed.edu/lsv/archives/lactnet.html