> Well, to begin with, INDEX isn't yet universally available, but I'd hardly > see INDEX a substitute for numbering digest entries! Numbering is passive, > index requires user action. > > For what it's worth, I am often asked for that feature as well, perhaps > because majordomo does it that way. > > -- > Bill > City University of New York > I wouldn't trade Listserv's digesting technique for Majordomo's if my life depended on it. In every Majordomo digest I've ever seen, it put no table of contents, I have never seen the numbered messages of which you speak, and the idea of the digest being a separate list is A PAIN. Give me Listserv or give me ... never mind. But one of the reasons I moved my list from Majordomo to Listserv was my extreme dissatisfaction with the digesting of messages. Bruce