>Aldo-Pier Solari writes >> >>The issue, here, is that various .com sources start using sig files >>for announcements to PUMP IN their PR "n" times/year ONCE they have >>been warned NOT TO abuse of the forum: This implies, in my view, a >>clear abuse of the unwritten law that "sig files may include >>whatever". >Certainly there was no such problem observable in Ms. Nachman's signature. >It contained no "PR", only a pointer to a Web page. No solicitation was >made, and no advertising was presented. I think your "issue" is a canard. [snip] >-- >Lefty [gYon-Pa] <[log in to unmask]> >C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:. Thank you for that. It is the funniest thing I have read all week. -- Life has no riddle. How utterly infantile to think such a thing. It's here. You make use of it while you can. http://cust.iamerica.net/mcdivitt/