On Sat, 31 Aug 1996, Patrick Leary wrote: > Of course no one can condone the public posting of a private message, > and I certainly don't. But I can't help being amused at seeing Caroline > Nachman and SquareNote cast in the role of victim--and on the listowners' > list, of all places! She and her associates are shamelessly cynical > marketers who have built an entire promotional strategy around the blind > spot that many listowners have about using .sig files for advertising, and > they have used this strategy for at least a year to victimize subscribers > on dozens, perhaps hundreds, of lists. I thank Patrick Leary and others for clarifying the SQN situation. After reading Aldo's initial post, in which he appeared to overreacting to an innocuous-looking .sig, I honestly didn't understand what fuss about SQN was. After reading the subsequent posts on the topic, I spent an hour researching SQN and their presence on the Internet, and have concluded that the above assessment of SQN is entirely accurate. I apologize for my previous clueless post on this topic. steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- H. Stephen Wright Music Library [log in to unmask] Northern Illinois University ----------------------------------------------------------------------