>>Received: from news1.radix.net (news1.radix.net [204.157.34.41]) by >saltmine.radix.net (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA16705 for ><[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 08:16:58 -0500 (EST) >>Received: from mtigwc02.worldnet.att.net (mailhost.worldnet.att.net >[204.127.129.4]) by news1.radix.net (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA17686 >for <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 08:18:42 -0500 (EST) >>Received: from LOCALNAME ([207.146.83.100]) by mtigwc02.worldnet.att.net >> (post.office MTA v2.0 0613 ) with SMTP id AAA13635; >> Wed, 6 Nov 1996 13:16:46 +0000 My guess is that Trey bcc'd you. Look at the above two RECEIVED lines -- they "say" that some att.net system (which is what Trey is using) sent it to another att.net system which sent it to [log in to unmask] No LISTSERV facilities were involved in delivering this SUB request to YOUR mailbox. >>X-Sender: [log in to unmask] >>X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 >>Mime-Version: 1.0 >>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >>To: [log in to unmask] >>From: Trey hicksock <[log in to unmask]> >>Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 13:16:46 +0000 >>Message-ID: <19961106131644.AAA13635@LOCALNAME> >> >>subscribe lawsch-l trey hicksock -- co-owner: INFOSYS, TQM-L, CPARK-L, ERAPPA-L, JANITORS, LDBASE-L, et -L URL:mailto:[log in to unmask] "I get paid by the millisecond"